In smart contract development, dynamic arrays often consume more gas, while using fixed-length arrays can effectively reduce gas costs.
Assigning values to dynamic arrays requires copying, and deleting elements requires shifting, both of which increase gas consumption. For example:
uint[] public arr;
function f() public {
for(uint i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
arr.push(i);
}
}
In contrast, fixed-length arrays have a fixed length, and values can be assigned directly through indexing without the need for shifting after deletion. For example:
uint[100] public arr;
function f() public {
for(uint i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
arr[i] = i;
}
}
Therefore, in cases where the length is known or the upper limit can be estimated, using fixed-length arrays can reduce gas consumption. It should be noted that fixed-length arrays cannot be extended in length, so if expansion is expected, dynamic arrays should still be used.
Using fixed-length arrays in smart contract optimization can significantly reduce gas costs, but it is necessary to consider whether the business scenario really requires a fixed length. Flexibly utilizing the advantages and disadvantages of dynamic arrays and fixed-length arrays can achieve the optimal gas usage efficiency.